Tuesday, September 23, 2008

The Wonder of Photoshop

Before                        After

It’s all about Trust!

Posted by Don in 06:51:15 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Saturday, September 13, 2008

She’s Named the Day

Now that the unlovely Helen has named 8 November as Election Day let us fervently hope that her sneering, vitriolic attacks upon John Key and the National Party will result in a wave of revulsion on the part of all voters.

On the other hand let us pray that John Key will remain above the mean squabble and win the election with clear cut, nettle-grasping policies.

My greatest hope is that the National Party will win with an outright majority so that we are spared the petty, time consuming, energy sapping inefficiencies of Mixed Member Proportional representation. MMP has cost New Zealand millions of dollars not only by doubling the number of members of parliament but also in satisfying minority interests in order for Labour to maintain a majority in the House of Representatives.

We have 120 MPs in a country whose GDP is smaller than some worldwide corporations whose policy making is managed by boards of only twenty-four.

The election of National will mean less government; i.e. a gradual reduction in the costs of bureaucracy - especially those aspects of government that deal with marginal matters such as what people are allowed to eat and what they can do to their homes; and in a cessation of the types of legislation that erode our rights as adult humans - such rubbish as the anti-smacking laws for example.

If Labour goes into a fourth term our liberties will come under increasing threat. We could get banged up for lighting a bonfire!

© DON DONOVAN

Posted by Don in 04:11:39 | Permalink | No Comments »

Monday, August 4, 2008

What Value Political Experience?


Three impending elections of interest are those of the United Kingdom (2010), USA and New Zealand. The latter two are imminent: November 2008.

In each case, there’s a bright new person competing against an establishment figure; and in each case, that established figure is claiming that his or her opponent should be damned for lack of Experience.

As Barack Obama strides, with consummate presidential poise, upon the hustings stages his opponent, John McCain positions himself as an old (but not too old) soldier with huge experience not only through conflict in actual wars but also as a senator from way back. He’s seen it all, he’s even been a prisoner of war subjected to torture. How could America possibly trust Obama more than McCain? Meanwhile Obama promises ‘change’, what else? Here we have the young, handsome new man against the saurian senior citizen.

Similarly in Great Britain, David Cameron is set to battle in 2010 against a man who walked in the shadow of Tony Blair in much the same way as Prince Charles follows the Queen. By the time Blair left office it was all a bit too late. Gordon Brown has been around for a long time, and has, he says, enormous experience when set alongside Cameron. But beside the fresh faced Cameron, Brown looks like an old horsehair-stuffed sofa whose innards are falling out and whose policies are imploding.

Here in New Zealand, Helen Clark pitches herself against John Key by emphasizing, again and again, her experience (as does Michael Cullen, Tonto to her Loan Ranger). She highlights John Key’s relative newness to politics as a weakness. She has, after all, been prime minister for nine years.

But inexperience, in this context, is not a weakness; it is a strength. Experience is just another way of saying ‘we’ve always done things this way.’ The longer the experience the more entrenched become attitudes and the less able are people to change their ways, think with imagination, and light up our world. They cannot believe that there can be a better way; it shows up when all they can do is try to diminish new policies by saying they won’t work ‘…we’ve been around a long time and we say they won’t work!’.

Consider this: for all her political experience Helen Clark completely lacks balance. She has never had a career outside politics. Her whole life has been spent in the public sector; a profit taker paid for by the tax payer. She has no children, she glosses over her marital status. She has no conception of what it takes to run a company or work in the private sector. She has never had to make profits in order to employ and pay workers, satisfy shareholders or pay company taxes. She has never had to change a nappy, or attend to a fractious or sick child in the middle of the night, she has never had to get the school lunch, do the school run, cook, wash, clean, iron for a standard family or buy their clothes. She cannot (for LACK of experience) understand the everyday stresses of everyday life.

John Key, on the other hand, represents everything to which a normal New Zealand family might aspire. A humble, working class upbringing nurtured by a solo mother; an ordinary schooling; boot-strap achievement leading on to commercial success on the world stage, whence he has returned to work for the country of his birth. As most of us would wish to be he is a self-made multi-millionaire. He’s not ashamed of that; why should he be?

Key has a typical Kiwi marriage to an attractive wife who has borne them healthy, happy children. He knows what family life is all about and he can understand the needs, hopes and desires of the ordinary New Zealand family. (As can, by the way, his number two: Bill English).

Why would John Key want to give up a career that would earn him far greater financial reward than politics? Some say power. I don’t think that’s the driver; I happen to believe that there is, in him, a ‘nouveau noblesse oblige’ that drives him to work for us New Zealanders because of a sense of duty, not power.

And while he may lack that stultifying experience in politics that the dinosaurs decry him for not having, he brings enormous experience of life in the round and in the cockpit of international commerce. John Key is capable of making New Zealand as successful as he has been.

As with Obama and Cameron, our future is all about Change. Ms Clark et al you can keep your stale smelling political experience: I’ll take Key for preference any time.

© DON DONOVAN

Posted by Don in 03:55:50 | Permalink | No Comments »

Sunday, June 22, 2008

The Republic of New Zealand (or Aotearoa) - Not If But When



The almost forgotten Irish catholic New Zealand Prime Minister Jim Bolger actively proposed a republic but when the newly elected Helen Clark agreed that New Zealand would eventually become one she qualified her words to the purport that while it was inevitable, it might be later rather than sooner - perhaps twenty years away; that was in 1999. Nine down, eleven to go.

Her characteristic basso profundo sound bite was picked up by media in the monarchy’s island fortress and with another inevitability was translated as the wish-list pronouncement of a rabidly republican new bloke down under.

A relative of mine who works on one of the large London dailies then sent me an email in which he said, ‘How are you enjoying your new leader? I understand that her chief objection to having the Queen as head of state is that she lives 12,000 miles away. Has this woman never heard of the Internet?’

Well that’s a strange interpretation of what she said, and an odd solution. Ms Clark’s opinion was that of a realist; and it has far less to do with distance than with change. Our protean population daily takes us farther away from Buckingham Palace and a distant monarchy grows ever more anachronistic. You only have to walk up Auckland’s Queen Street and look into faces to realize that we are more to do with Asia and the Pacific than with Europe. As for their majesties conducting commonwealth business dot com, the mind boggles. One can sense the hackers’ fingertips itching.

At the same time as Helen Clark’s speculations were being misinterpreted I sensed a subtle change coming over the European Union (the change continues thanks to the Irish referendum of June 2008). It’s a conglomerate in whose long term survival I’ve never believed. While a statesmanlike altruism might attach to some of its planners and leaders, greed and national self-interest will eventually emerge as the European countries’ driving forces. Only while the citizens of each member state are led to believe that there’s something in it for them will it hang together.

Europe has always been a restless stew of warring factions whose fights over the ages have varied from continental power bloc punch-ups to tribal spats. For the time being the big wars are at rest but the same ingredients for all-encompassing warfare are manifest in a range of fights from ugly Balkan hates to unruly continental and British truck drivers who block the highways; from politically contrived food bans to the incursions of soccer hooligans as fascist as any Austrian minority party leader. Little wars become big wars.

The fact is that while a veneer of civilized behaviour coats their daily transactions, beneath the surface Europeans viscerally dislike each other. The English are contemptuous of the French who are disdainful of anybody who cannot speak French. The Spanish loom sadly. Italians are seen as irresponsible food and wine lovers who’ve had more governments than there have been years since the end of the second world war. Scandinavians are cold and aloof. Demanding Germans trample over everybody.

How can the European Union hold together with hates like those pervading? The answer is that it won’t. As with New Zealand’s continuance as a monarchy, it’s not a question of whether it will disintegrate but when. A fine manipulation of timing, judgment or misjudgment.

Before the disintegration of the EU will come the republicanization of Australasia. Australia will become a republic first, swiftly followed by New Zealand. Who then becomes a president hardly bears thinking about. Here, in time, it could be Clark; in Australia, Rudd.

God help us.

[ENDS]

© DON DONOVAN

Posted by Don in 04:57:59 | Permalink | Comments (1) »

Thursday, July 12, 2007

New Zealand’s Party Animals 30

‘I was pretty focused on what I was doing
in the back seat, actually…’

Helen Clark when asked if she was aware a car in which
she was passenger may have been travelling
at a potentially dangerous speed.

 

© DON DONOVAN

Posted by Don in 00:13:06 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Friday, May 18, 2007

New Zealand’s Party Animals 28

‘I read Helen Clark’s speech…’

Rodney Hide

‘You’re the only one!’

Tau Henare.

 

© DON DONOVAN

Posted by Don in 00:08:48 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Monday, March 19, 2007

New Zealand’s Party Animals 20

‘E whakaae ana te Pirimia ki te korero o tana Minita o te Manatu Aorere, i a ia e ki ana i tenei Whare i te 13 o Hakihea i te tau kua hipa mo nga take whakawhitiwhiti korero ki nga tangata whenua o te ao. Anei pea te whakautu pai ki a matou ko te kawanatanga e korero ana ki te tangata whenua, kua whakaae mai tetahi, nga tangata whenua nei hei minita mo nga take o tawahi. Mena ae, ko wai ma te hunga i wananga nei tenei korero?’

Te Ururoa Flavell

I am having a little problem understanding that question.

Helen Clark

© DON DONOVAN

 

Posted by Don in 02:36:43 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Sunday, December 24, 2006

New Zealand’s Party Animals 2

‘I sometimes wonder whether I am a victim of my own success as a popular and competent Prime Minister’

Helen Clark

 

©DON DONOVAN

Posted by Don in 03:05:44 | Permalink | Comments (1) »